The AS90 Self Propelled Gun
The whole time I was in Otterburn it did not get above 0º. It was bloody cold! There was a tiny bit of snow on the ground from the previous week but nothing substantial.
I was there to cover 26 Regt Royal Artillery also known as the "Midland Gunners". these guys had already been up there for a week and were about to spend a few more fun filled weeks up in Otterburn. They had travelled all the way from Gutersloh, Germany as well!
Usual stuff from me. Whack the old wide angle on and get involved in everything.
I had never seen these fire. I had only heard them fire in Iraq against the bad guys who fired Chinese rockets at us everyday for three months solid. I had seen the what they did though. I worked in the main Ops room for a while in Iraq and all the live feeds from the Predator drones were on screens in there. I can remember seeing two guys set up a rail and point it in the direction of our camp. As soon as they started to put the Chinese rockets on the rail the signal was given and a few seconds later there was a loud bang and on screen a puff of smoke and these guys were wiped of the face of the earth.
I finished off the day with a night shoot. I wanted to get all four guns firing at once with big, baddass flames shooting out. If I used a long shutter speed they would all fire within 5 seconds of each other and I should get that effect. I set all my gear up and waited. I worked out pretty soon that these huge, powerful guns didn't emit any flash at all. Just a massive boom and a puff of smoke. That was that picture out of the game. So I just waited and waited and waited, till a break in the clouds and the stars came out, with this the moon came out behind me and smashed a bit of light on the rear of the guns.
This is what I came back with. Pretty groovy I think!
The next day was capturing the guns being used in the 'direct fire' method. When the guy who was taking me round said they used artillery guns in the direct fire method I thought it was crazy. But I guess if there is a tank coming towards you, your gonna fire back with what you got and the GPMG on the top wont cut it against a tank!
That was it from that job. Only spent two days up there. It was good to see the guns in action and to chat to the guys and girls there. Another insight to what else the Army does. The worse bit about it was the seven hour drive back home after. Motorway traffic on a Friday afternoon is not fun!!
Here i also a little video of inside when the gun in firing.
Anyways, until next time.
Stay Safe.
Comments
================================================
A useful starting point
The Relationship Between Trading Volume and Fees is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on why notional turnover may produce fees without indicating profitability. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonksfun or stonks xyz, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on why notional turnover may produce fees without indicating profitability. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Neither high protocol revenue nor token burns by themselves establish that a token is underpriced. Financial claims should connect an observable mechanism to a carefully limited conclusion, rather than leap from activity to a promised return.
A final practical point is terminology. stonks xyz can appear in search results as a shorthand or mistyped query, but it should not be used as a substitute for verifying where an asset is listed and what contract is involved. The most helpful guide clarifies these details rather than turning ambiguous search language into unsupported factual claims.
It is also useful to maintain a small research log: note the date, the trading pair, the token mint, the source of any fee estimate and the liquidity conditions observed. With that information, subsequent changes are easier to explain. Without it, yesterday’s screenshot may be mistaken for today’s applicable terms.
In practice
To understand the relationship between trading volume and fees, begin with a fee rate times eligible trading volume is a starting intuition rather than full accounting. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Time frames matter. A single active day can dominate a weekly average, while a cumulative figure keeps growing as historical activity accumulates. Analysts should label every number with its period and avoid extrapolating a brief surge into an annual guarantee.
Take a hypothetical example related to why notional turnover may produce fees without indicating profitability: two traders see the same coin at a given moment, but one plans a small test trade while the other intends a much larger order. The second trader may receive a materially different effective price if liquidity is limited. This illustrates why a market label, an attractive theme and a quoted price do not describe the entire trading experience.
Another useful distinction concerns the evidence behind a fee rate times eligible trading volume is a starting intuition rather than full accounting. A project description explains intended design; a transaction record demonstrates that a particular action occurred; a dashboard aggregates activity according to its own methodology. Strong analysis keeps these categories separate, checks dates and recognizes where an interpretation still depends on assumptions.
What to check
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine creator payouts, holders revenue and protocol allocations may differ. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Fee allocation can vary by launch mode and stage of a market. The stated creator share on one screen is not automatically a universal commission across every product or every date. Traders should look for current documentation and distinguish illustrative examples from guaranteed payments.
The surrounding Solana environment also affects why notional turnover may produce fees without indicating profitability. Network transaction fees, execution routes, the behavior of the quote asset and pool depth may all influence the result a wallet user experiences. Even when the application interface makes the process feel simple, the transaction remains part of an open and sometimes volatile market.
No single metric is sufficient for a new onchain token. Price, nominal market value, the number of swaps, wallet distribution and depth of available liquidity can tell different stories. Reading them together does not remove uncertainty, but it can reveal weaknesses that disappear in a one-number summary.
The bigger picture
For a grounded assessment, A fee rate times eligible trading volume is a starting intuition rather than full accounting. At the same time, creator payouts, holders revenue and protocol allocations may differ. A search for stonk launch xyz may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.